Excuse me gentlemen, but I see your discussions have nothing to do with using CHIRP.  Wrong venue for these type conversations.
----- Original Message -----
From: Don McRoberts
To: 'Discussion of CHIRP'
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [chirp_users] The VHF low band is still in use

Actually, one of the main reasons for California’s use of low-band VHF is because a large portion of California is mountainous and higher frequencies simply require a lot more infrastructure in the way of repeaters to be able to cover the same areas with hills and valleys. This would result in much higher costs for reliable coverage.

 

73 de W3DRM - Don

 

 

From: chirp_users-bounces@intrepid.danplanet.com [mailto:chirp_users-bounces@intrepid.danplanet.com] On Behalf Of jl_wilkerson@att.net
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 11:15 AM
To: chirp_users@intrepid.danplanet.com
Subject: Re: [chirp_users] The VHF low band is still in use

 

With the open spaces, large patrol areas and such, vhf LO is probably the best band out there for them.

 

------ Original message------

From: J. David Aten via chirp_users

Date: Mon, Sep 5, 2016 12:41 PM

To: chirp_users@intrepid.danplanet.com;

Subject:[chirp_users] The VHF low band is still in use

 

One of the largest police agencies, with thousands of radios, and covering one of the largest geographical areas, still uses VHF low band, and has absolutely no plans on moving, or changing.  That is the California Highway Patrol.  (CHP). 

 


_______________________________________________
chirp_users mailing list
chirp_users@intrepid.danplanet.com
http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users
This message was sent to BillG226 at wcgabbard1@windstream.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to chirp_users-unsubscribe@intrepid.danplanet.com