Undoubtedly that would work, but that defeats the purpose - letting the authors know that there might be a problem is the better solution.  (( even though there wasn't a real problem this time ))

------ Original Message ------
From: "John Wuest" <jhwuest@gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of CHIRP" <chirp_users@intrepid.danplanet.com>
Sent: Sun 1 30 22 14:14:49
Subject: Re: [chirp_users] RepeaterBook Queries return No Channels Found

Forget about the search from within CHIRP. Use the website results and export the data to a CHIRP formatted file.

On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 2:18 PM Daniel Hallmark <ae4on.usa@gmail.com> wrote:
Please disregard my previous No Channels Found report.  I had neglected to type in "mi" as the unit for the proximity distance value. My mistake.

I did observe that when I performed a proximity query for 50 miles around Fairfield Glade, TN on 2m, the response only contained 5  repeaters, but a similar query on the website for Confirmed On-Air FM repeaters returns 17 repeaters (excluding those that report any kind of digital capability, even just echolink or allstar).  Is there a way to clear up this apparent discrepancy in the query results?

Thanks,
Daniel (AE4ON)

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 1:26 PM Daniel Hallmark <ae4on.usa@gmail.com> wrote:
Attempts to query RepeaterBook for either political or proximity queries are returning "No channels found" even though I receive results when I run the same queries via the RepeaterBook website. 
_______________________________________________
chirp_users mailing list
chirp_users@intrepid.danplanet.com
http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users
This message was sent to John Wuest at jhwuest@gmail.com
To unsubscribe, send an email to chirp_users-unsubscribe@intrepid.danplanet.com