Was this patch simply overlooked or was it rejected for some reason?

Jim

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Jim Unroe rock.unroe@gmail.com wrote:

# HG changeset patch # User Jim Unroe rock.unroe@gmail.com # Date 1494108983 14400 # Node ID 1032d003d8eac7b38bee5bf7ef47441866f11064 # Parent 55efac8845ad21bd404ecd9c94e8dfcb787c47c1 [LT-580] Add Support for Luiton LT-580 Mobile Radios

This patch adds the Luition LT-580 VHF and LT-580 UHF mobile radios to the TYT TH-9000 driver.

#4231

diff -r 55efac8845ad -r 1032d003d8ea chirp/drivers/th9000.py --- a/chirp/drivers/th9000.py Sat Apr 08 20:02:48 2017 -0400 +++ b/chirp/drivers/th9000.py Sat May 06 18:16:23 2017 -0400 @@ -434,7 +434,8 @@ endframe = "\x45\x4E\x44" _echo_write(radio, endframe) result = radio.pipe.read(1)

• if result != "\x06":

• # TYT radios acknowledge the "endframe" command, Luiton radios do not.
• if result != "" and result != "\x06": LOG.error( "Got:\n%s" % util.hexprint(result)) raise errors.RadioError("Radio did not finish cleanly")

@@ -813,6 +814,17 @@

     return False

+# Declaring Aliases (Clones of the real radios) +class LT580VHF(chirp_common.Alias):

• VENDOR = "LUITON"
• MODEL = "LT-580_VHF"

+class LT580UHF(chirp_common.Alias):

• VENDOR = "LUITON"
• MODEL = "LT-580_UHF"

@directory.register class Th9000220Radio(Th9000Radio): """TYT TH-9000 220""" @@ -828,6 +840,7 @@ MODEL = "TH9000_144" BAUD_RATE = 9600 valid_freq = [(136000000, 174000000)]

• ALIASES = [LT580VHF, ]

@directory.register class Th9000440Radio(Th9000220Radio): @@ -836,3 +849,4 @@ MODEL = "TH9000_440" BAUD_RATE = 9600 valid_freq = [(400000000, 490000000)]

• ALIASES = [LT580UHF, ]