On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Dan Smith <dsmith@danplanet.com> wrote:
>  struct {
> +  u8 code222[3];
> +  u8 unused222[2];
> +  u8 code333[3];
> +  u8 unused333[2];
> +  u8 alarmcode[3];
> +  u8 unused119[2];
> +  u8 unknown1;
> +  u8 code555[3];
> +  u8 unused555[2];
> +  u8 code666[3];
> +  u8 unused666[2];
> +  u8 code777[3];
> +  u8 unused777[2];
> +  u8 unknown2;
> +  u8 code60606[5];
> +  u8 code70707[5];

Just so I'm clear, are you adding the other elements here and planning
to use them later (i.e. everything other than alarmcode).

Dan,
That's a valid question. I debated about this myself and probably should have asked your opinion about it.

I considered making another structure for just the alarm code. But this area of memory is what I call the ANI block. It definitely has other set of codes within this block. But at this point I don't if the UV-5R is even capable of using them. If I discover how to use them, sure I will add those to the list of features.

What you you rather see? 'alarmcode' flanked by large unknowns or a separate structure until a usefulness for the rest of the memory locations can be established?
Jim