Re: [chirp_devel] [PATCH 3 of 3] Add a test to look for contradictions in radio_features

Well ... it's exactly what we have for tones: "if radio has_ctone use X else use Y" Consistency between tones and dtcs is vital from my point of view.

Well, it's not exactly the same scenario, but fair point.

Seriously, the only confusing thing I see is that we have "DTCS" mode (with a name schema similar to "Tone") and it means "DTCS SQL", if I would change something I'd rename "DTCS" to "DTCS SQL" and add a "DTCS" with the meaning of tx only.

Your move ...

Hmm, I'm just not sure. I've lost a bit of context from a few days ago when I was working on the thuvf1 driver, so I need to go back and review that, and then think on it a bit I suppose.