On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Robert Terzi rct@r-t.org wrote:
On 12/30/2013 1:03 AM, Tom Hayward wrote:
It makes more sense to me to begin by supporting Import/Export of settings via img from identical radio models. For example, import uv5r.img into another uv5r. For this you will not need any CSV encoding or translation between models. I think this feature would satisfy most user's need for settings import.
Couldn't that use case of moving settings to an identical radio already be handled by just using the source image after importing the frequencies from the destination radio's image?
As Jens mentioned, there's other stuff in the radio img you don't want to blindly copy, like calibration data. I was suggesting copying only the known settings bytes. Since it's the same model, you can simply copy the settings blob without any conversion. The UI for this feature could simply be a checkbox under the frequency import table that says "also import settings?".
The recently requested use case was the possibility of improved accessibility for the visually impaired by allowing CSV export and import. As mentioned, this would need 100% fidelity in the export and re-import to be useful, so would be difficult to achieve, especially with CSV.
I have yet to understand this use case, so I was ignoring it. Can anyone explain how putting settings in a CSV improves accessibility? Guessing here, but is LibreOffice spreadsheet-to-speech really that much better?
I don't see how CSV is going to be a reasonable or effective way of encoding settings information.
The use case that I haven't seen mentioned, is exporting to some textual representation to facilitate settings comparisons. This is useful for not only comparing two radios, but also for determining what settings have changed over time on a single radio. I use G4HFQ's FTBVX8 software in that manner. The settings user interface is table oriented and can be exported to text files making compares possible, even on radios with a lot of settings like the VX-8.
I've never seen this. I'm curious how settings are put in a table format. Key-value seems more natural.
As this can be very useful for diagnostic purposes, I'd be interested in seeing some sort of textual export/report, even if there were no import, initially just an additional developer function. More of the settings meta data would need to be exposed, which would wind up providing additional documentation for each radio's settings. I'm guessing that is where Jens J. is headed recently asking about doc strings for settings.
It probably wouldn't be too involved to add a JSON output to RadioSettingGroup. You could run a diff on this. This makes some sense to me for power users, but not for accessibility.
Tom KD7LXL