- # Return channels for a bank. Bank given as number
- def get_bank_channels(self, bank):
nchannels = 0size = self._memobj.bank_sizes[bank]if size<= 198:nchannels = 1 + size/2_channels = self._memobj.bank_channels[bank]channels = []for i in range(0, nchannels):channels.append(_channels.channel[i])return channels
This is so that we can present the user with a list of channels belonging to a bank, right? I.e, they want to create a bank by tagging channels into it instead of marking the channel with a specific bank...
So, maybe we need to change the UI to not allow per-memory bank editing for any of the radios, but rather make the bank editor more robust, and capable of handling the one-to-one and one-to-many bank models. I'm definitely in favor of a unified workflow in the UI. We'll just need to change the current bank-supporting drivers to return banks of memories (like you have above) and declare whether they support one-to-one or one-to-many.
Sound reasonable? I can try to hack some of the UI changes up in a prototype patch if this seems like a good path forward.